Cited references for this diagram

Showing
X
of
X
Clear fields
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Click to enable scroll
Ref
ID
Cause  → Effect
Excerpt
DOI Link
4
12
Comprehensiveness and reach of the menthol ban → (S) NRT Sales, PCS = 7.5

However, event study analysis ​​showed increases in each NRT product sales in two quarters ​​before the policy change in Massachusetts, indicating preinter​vention increases in NRT product sales (online supplemental ​​figure S2).

Coded Excerpt Cause:
Menthol Flavor Ban
Coded Excerpt Effect:
Pre-ban NRT Sales
Excerpt polarity:
+
Citation:

Asare, S., Xue, Z., Bandi, P., Westmaas, J. L., Jemal, A., & Nargis, N. (2024). Association of nicotine replacement therapy product sales with menthol cigarette sales restriction in Massachusetts. Tobacco Control, 33(6), 813–816.

4
13
Comprehensiveness and reach of the menthol ban → (S) NRT Sales, PCS = 7.5

Compared with the comparison states, the unadjusted 4-week ​​NRT product sales per 1000 adults who smoke cigarettes in ​​Massachusetts increased by 505.10 (95% CI 83.01 to 927.19; ​​p=0.02) pieces for gums

Coded Excerpt Cause:
Menthol Flavor Ban
Coded Excerpt Effect:
NRT Sales (Gums) Post Ban
Excerpt polarity:
+
Citation:

Asare, S., Xue, Z., Bandi, P., Westmaas, J. L., Jemal, A., & Nargis, N. (2024). Association of nicotine replacement therapy product sales with menthol cigarette sales restriction in Massachusetts. Tobacco Control, 33(6), 813–816.

4
14
Comprehensiveness and reach of the menthol ban → (S) NRT Sales, PCS = 7.5

Compared with the comparison states, the unadjusted 4-week NRT product sales per 1000 adults who smoke cigarettes in Massachusetts increased by 505.10 (95% CI 83.01 to 927.19; p=0.02) pieces for gums and 393.96 (95% CI 175.01 to 612.90; p

Coded Excerpt Cause:
Menthol Flavor Ban
Coded Excerpt Effect:
NRT Sales (Lozenges) Post Ban
Excerpt polarity:
+
Citation:

Asare, S., Xue, Z., Bandi, P., Westmaas, J. L., Jemal, A., & Nargis, N. (2024). Association of nicotine replacement therapy product sales with menthol cigarette sales restriction in Massachusetts. Tobacco Control, 33(6), 813–816.

4
15
Comprehensiveness and reach of the menthol ban → (S) NRT Sales, PCS = 7.5

The adjusted 4-week NRT product sales per 1000 adults who ​​smoke cigarettes in Massachusetts compared with the compar​ison states increased by 643.11 (95% CI 365.33 to 920.89; ​​p

Coded Excerpt Cause:
Menthol Flavor Ban
Coded Excerpt Effect:
NRT Sales (Gums) Post Ban
Excerpt polarity:
+
Citation:

Asare, S., Xue, Z., Bandi, P., Westmaas, J. L., Jemal, A., & Nargis, N. (2024). Association of nicotine replacement therapy product sales with menthol cigarette sales restriction in Massachusetts. Tobacco Control, 33(6), 813–816.

4
16
Comprehensiveness and reach of the menthol ban → (S) NRT Sales, PCS = 7.5

The adjusted 4-week NRT product sales per 1000 adults who smoke cigarettes in Massachusetts compared with the comparison states increased by 643.11 (95% CI 365.33 to 920.89; p

Coded Excerpt Cause:
Menthol Flavor Ban
Coded Excerpt Effect:
NRT Sales (Lozenges) Post Ban
Excerpt polarity:
+
Citation:

Asare, S., Xue, Z., Bandi, P., Westmaas, J. L., Jemal, A., & Nargis, N. (2024). Association of nicotine replacement therapy product sales with menthol cigarette sales restriction in Massachusetts. Tobacco Control, 33(6), 813–816.

4
17
Comprehensiveness and reach of the menthol ban → (S) NRT Sales, PCS = 7.5

There was no statistically significant ​​change in patch NRT sales per 1000 adults who smoke cigarettes ​​in Massachusetts compared with the comparison states after ​​the policy was implemented.

Coded Excerpt Cause:
Menthol Flavor Ban
Coded Excerpt Effect:
NRT Sales (Patches) Post Ban
Excerpt polarity:
=
Citation:

Asare, S., Xue, Z., Bandi, P., Westmaas, J. L., Jemal, A., & Nargis, N. (2024). Association of nicotine replacement therapy product sales with menthol cigarette sales restriction in Massachusetts. Tobacco Control, 33(6), 813–816.

4
18
Comprehensiveness and reach of the menthol ban → (S) NRT Sales, PCS = 7.5

By redefining the after-policy period to include the period of ​​anticipation (1 January 2020 to 13 June 2020), we estimated ​​higher increases in the sales of NRT products for gums (887.80 ​​pieces; 95% CI 633.80 to 1141.80; p

Coded Excerpt Cause:
Menthol Flavor Ban
Coded Excerpt Effect:
NRT Sales (Gums) Post Ban
Excerpt polarity:
+
Citation:

Asare, S., Xue, Z., Bandi, P., Westmaas, J. L., Jemal, A., & Nargis, N. (2024). Association of nicotine replacement therapy product sales with menthol cigarette sales restriction in Massachusetts. Tobacco Control, 33(6), 813–816.

4
19
Comprehensiveness and reach of the menthol ban → (S) NRT Sales, PCS = 7.5

By redefining the after-policy period to include the period of ​​anticipation (1 January 2020 to 13 June 2020), we estimated ​​higher increases in the sales of NRT products for gums (887.80 ​​pieces; 95% CI 633.80 to 1141.80; p

Coded Excerpt Cause:
Menthol Flavor Ban
Coded Excerpt Effect:
NRT Sales (Lozenges) Post Ban
Excerpt polarity:
+
Citation:

Asare, S., Xue, Z., Bandi, P., Westmaas, J. L., Jemal, A., & Nargis, N. (2024). Association of nicotine replacement therapy product sales with menthol cigarette sales restriction in Massachusetts. Tobacco Control, 33(6), 813–816.

4
20
Comprehensiveness and reach of the menthol ban → (S) NRT Sales, PCS = 7.5

By redefining the after-policy period to include the period of ​​anticipation (1 January 2020 to 13 June 2020), we estimated ​​higher increases in the sales of NRT products for gums (887.80 ​​pieces; 95% CI 633.80 to 1141.80; p

Coded Excerpt Cause:
Menthol Flavor Ban
Coded Excerpt Effect:
NRT Sales (Patches) Post Ban
Excerpt polarity:
+
Citation:

Asare, S., Xue, Z., Bandi, P., Westmaas, J. L., Jemal, A., & Nargis, N. (2024). Association of nicotine replacement therapy product sales with menthol cigarette sales restriction in Massachusetts. Tobacco Control, 33(6), 813–816.

10
77
Strength/funding of tobacco control programs → (S) Comprehensiveness and reach of the menthol ban, PCS = 4

Facilitators included strong city council support, leadership from impacted communities, community awareness-building campaigns, and understanding tobacco industry counter-tactics

Coded Excerpt Cause:
Involvement of leadership from flavored(incl menthol) tobacco impacted communities
Coded Excerpt Effect:
Effectiveness of menthol restriction policy
Excerpt polarity:
+
Citation:

Bosma, L. M., D’Silva, J., Moze, J., Matter, C., Kingsbury, J. H., & Brock, B. (2021). Restricting Sales of Menthol Tobacco Products: Lessons Learned from Policy Passage and Implementation in Minneapolis, St. Paul, and Duluth, Minnesota. Health Equity, 5(1), 439–447.

10
78
Strength/funding of tobacco control programs → (S) Comprehensiveness and reach of the menthol ban, PCS = 4

Facilitators included strong city council support, leadership from impacted communities, community awareness-building campaigns, and understanding tobacco industry counter-tactics

Coded Excerpt Cause:
Community awareness building campaigns
Coded Excerpt Effect:
Effectiveness of menthol restriction policy
Excerpt polarity:
+
Citation:

Bosma, L. M., D’Silva, J., Moze, J., Matter, C., Kingsbury, J. H., & Brock, B. (2021). Restricting Sales of Menthol Tobacco Products: Lessons Learned from Policy Passage and Implementation in Minneapolis, St. Paul, and Duluth, Minnesota. Health Equity, 5(1), 439–447.

10
79
Strength/funding of tobacco control programs → (S) Comprehensiveness and reach of the menthol ban, PCS = 4

Facilitators included strong city council support, leadership from impacted communities, community awareness-building campaigns, and understanding tobacco industry counter-tactics

Coded Excerpt Cause:
Understanding tobacco industry counter-tactics
Coded Excerpt Effect:
Effectiveness of menthol restriction policy
Excerpt polarity:
+
Citation:

Bosma, L. M., D’Silva, J., Moze, J., Matter, C., Kingsbury, J. H., & Brock, B. (2021). Restricting Sales of Menthol Tobacco Products: Lessons Learned from Policy Passage and Implementation in Minneapolis, St. Paul, and Duluth, Minnesota. Health Equity, 5(1), 439–447.

10
76
Support for flavor ban → (S) Comprehensiveness and reach of the menthol ban, PCS = 1

Facilitators included strong city council support, leadership from impacted communities, community awareness-building campaigns, and understanding tobacco industry counter-tactics

Coded Excerpt Cause:
City council support
Coded Excerpt Effect:
Effectiveness of menthol restriction policy
Excerpt polarity:
+
Citation:

Bosma, L. M., D’Silva, J., Moze, J., Matter, C., Kingsbury, J. H., & Brock, B. (2021). Restricting Sales of Menthol Tobacco Products: Lessons Learned from Policy Passage and Implementation in Minneapolis, St. Paul, and Duluth, Minnesota. Health Equity, 5(1), 439–447.

26
160
Quit Attempts → (S) Menthol cigarette users quitting altogether, PCS = 1

Smokers who did not make ​​a quit attempt before bans were less likely than those who made ​​a pre-ban quit attempt to make a quit attempt at follow-up

Coded Excerpt Cause:
Making a quit attempt pre-menthol ban
Coded Excerpt Effect:
Quit Attempts (Post Ban)
Excerpt polarity:
+
Citation:

Chung-Hall, J., Fong, G. T., Meng, G., Cummings, K. M., Hyland, A., O’Connor, R. J., Quah, A. C. K., & Craig, L. V. (2022). Evaluating the impact of menthol cigarette bans on cessation and smoking behaviours in Canada: longitudinal findings from the Canadian arm of the 2016–2018 ITC Four Country Smoking and Vaping Surveys. Tobacco Control, 31(4), 556–563.

26
160
Intentions to Quit → (S) Quit Attempts, PCS = 5

Smokers who did not make ​​a quit attempt before bans were less likely than those who made ​​a pre-ban quit attempt to make a quit attempt at follow-up

Coded Excerpt Cause:
Making a quit attempt pre-menthol ban
Coded Excerpt Effect:
Quit Attempts (Post Ban)
Excerpt polarity:
+
Citation:

Chung-Hall, J., Fong, G. T., Meng, G., Cummings, K. M., Hyland, A., O’Connor, R. J., Quah, A. C. K., & Craig, L. V. (2022). Evaluating the impact of menthol cigarette bans on cessation and smoking behaviours in Canada: longitudinal findings from the Canadian arm of the 2016–2018 ITC Four Country Smoking and Vaping Surveys. Tobacco Control, 31(4), 556–563.

26
161
Intentions to Quit → (S) Quit Attempts, PCS = 5

Smokers with no plans to quit before bans were also less likely ​​than those with plans to quit before bans to make a quit attempt ​​at follow-up.

Coded Excerpt Cause:
Planning to quit smoking pre-menthol ban
Coded Excerpt Effect:
Quit Attempts (Post Ban)
Excerpt polarity:
+
Citation:

Chung-Hall, J., Fong, G. T., Meng, G., Cummings, K. M., Hyland, A., O’Connor, R. J., Quah, A. C. K., & Craig, L. V. (2022). Evaluating the impact of menthol cigarette bans on cessation and smoking behaviours in Canada: longitudinal findings from the Canadian arm of the 2016–2018 ITC Four Country Smoking and Vaping Surveys. Tobacco Control, 31(4), 556–563.

33
212
Intentions to Quit → (S) Quit Attempts, PCS = 5

Menthol smokers who ​​said they would quit in the event of a ban were ​​more likely to have attempted to quit in the pre​vious 12 months than those who said they would ​​not

Coded Excerpt Cause:
Quit attempt in last 12 months
Coded Excerpt Effect:
Intention to quit if menthol ban were enacted
Excerpt polarity:
+
Citation:

D’Silva, J., Amato, M. S., & Boyle, R. G. (2015). Quitting and Switching: Menthol Smokers’ Responses to a Menthol Ban. Tobacco Regulatory Science, 1(1), 54–60.

36
233
Nicotine Dependence → (S) Menthol use, PCS = 9.5

In Canada, menthol or ​capsule smoking was more common among participants who reported being a little or very addicted ​to cigarettes than those who reported not being addicted (3.1% vs 1.3%; AOR, 1.02; 95% CI, ​1.00-1.03; P = .01) (Table 2)

Coded Excerpt Cause:
Perceiving oneself as a little or very addicted to cigarettes (vs. not at all addicted)
Coded Excerpt Effect:
Menthol Cigarette Smoking
Excerpt polarity:
+
Citation:

East, K. A., Reid, J. L., Burkhalter, R., Kock, L., Hyland, A., Fong, G. T., & Hammond, D. (2022). Evaluating the Outcomes of the Menthol Cigarette Ban in England by Comparing Menthol Cigarette Smoking Among Youth in England, Canada, and the US, 2018-2020. JAMA Network Open, 5(5), e2210029.

36
234
Nicotine Dependence → (S) Menthol use, PCS = 9.5

In England, there was little evidence for any associations between ​cigarette consumption or dependence and menthol or capsule smoking (Table 2).

Coded Excerpt Cause:
Nicotine dependence
Coded Excerpt Effect:
Menthol Cigarette Smoking
Excerpt polarity:
=
Citation:

East, K. A., Reid, J. L., Burkhalter, R., Kock, L., Hyland, A., Fong, G. T., & Hammond, D. (2022). Evaluating the Outcomes of the Menthol Cigarette Ban in England by Comparing Menthol Cigarette Smoking Among Youth in England, Canada, and the US, 2018-2020. JAMA Network Open, 5(5), e2210029.

36
235
Nicotine Dependence → (S) Menthol use, PCS = 9.5

In the US, menthol ​or capsule smoking was more common among those who smoked on at least 20 of the past 30 days ​vs otherwise (38.1% vs 32.7%; AOR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.01-1.13; P = .03)

Coded Excerpt Cause:
Frequent smoking (smoking ≥20 of past 30 d) (vs smoking less than 20 of past 30 d)
Coded Excerpt Effect:
Menthol Cigarette Smoking
Excerpt polarity:
+
Citation:

East, K. A., Reid, J. L., Burkhalter, R., Kock, L., Hyland, A., Fong, G. T., & Hammond, D. (2022). Evaluating the Outcomes of the Menthol Cigarette Ban in England by Comparing Menthol Cigarette Smoking Among Youth in England, Canada, and the US, 2018-2020. JAMA Network Open, 5(5), e2210029.

36
236
Nicotine Dependence → (S) Menthol use, PCS = 9.5

In the US, menthol or capsule smoking was more common among those ... who smoked 2 to 5 (37.9%) or more than 5 (38.5%) cigarettes per day than those who smoked 1 or fewer (29.8%) (2-5 vs 1 cigarettes per day, AOR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.02-1.15; P = .006; >5 vs 1 cigarettes per day, AOR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.03-1.18; P = .007) [C1] United States [/C1]

Coded Excerpt Cause:
Cigarette smoking frequency
Coded Excerpt Effect:
Menthol Cigarette Smoking
Excerpt polarity:
+
Citation:

East, K. A., Reid, J. L., Burkhalter, R., Kock, L., Hyland, A., Fong, G. T., & Hammond, D. (2022). Evaluating the Outcomes of the Menthol Cigarette Ban in England by Comparing Menthol Cigarette Smoking Among Youth in England, Canada, and the US, 2018-2020. JAMA Network Open, 5(5), e2210029.

36
237
Nicotine Dependence → (S) Menthol use, PCS = 9.5

In the US, menthol or capsule smoking was more common among those ... who reported urges to smoke every or most days vs less often (38.0% vs 30.3%; AOR, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.02-1.14; P = .006) (Table 2) [C1] United States [/C1]

Coded Excerpt Cause:
Urges to smoke every or most days (vs. less often)
Coded Excerpt Effect:
Menthol Cigarette Smoking
Excerpt polarity:
+
Citation:

East, K. A., Reid, J. L., Burkhalter, R., Kock, L., Hyland, A., Fong, G. T., & Hammond, D. (2022). Evaluating the Outcomes of the Menthol Cigarette Ban in England by Comparing Menthol Cigarette Smoking Among Youth in England, Canada, and the US, 2018-2020. JAMA Network Open, 5(5), e2210029.

36
243
Nicotine Dependence → (S) Menthol use, PCS = 9.5

Any menthol or capsule smoking in the past 30 days was also associated with a greater number of consumption and dependence indicators in all 3 countries than the usual brand measure (Table 2).

Coded Excerpt Cause:
Frequent smoking (smoking ≥20 of past 30 d) (vs smoking less than 20 of past 30 d)
Coded Excerpt Effect:
Any menthol or capsule smoking in the past 30 days
Excerpt polarity:
+
Citation:

East, K. A., Reid, J. L., Burkhalter, R., Kock, L., Hyland, A., Fong, G. T., & Hammond, D. (2022). Evaluating the Outcomes of the Menthol Cigarette Ban in England by Comparing Menthol Cigarette Smoking Among Youth in England, Canada, and the US, 2018-2020. JAMA Network Open, 5(5), e2210029.

36
244
Nicotine Dependence → (S) Menthol use, PCS = 9.5

Any menthol or capsule smoking in the past 30 days was also associated with a greater number of consumption and dependence indicators in all 3 countries than the usual brand measure (Table 2).

Coded Excerpt Cause:
Perceiving oneself as a little or very addicted to cigarettes (vs. not at all addicted)
Coded Excerpt Effect:
Any menthol or capsule smoking in the past 30 days
Excerpt polarity:
+
Citation:

East, K. A., Reid, J. L., Burkhalter, R., Kock, L., Hyland, A., Fong, G. T., & Hammond, D. (2022). Evaluating the Outcomes of the Menthol Cigarette Ban in England by Comparing Menthol Cigarette Smoking Among Youth in England, Canada, and the US, 2018-2020. JAMA Network Open, 5(5), e2210029.

36
245
Nicotine Dependence → (S) Menthol use, PCS = 9.5

Any menthol or capsule smoking in the past 30 days was also associated with a greater number of consumption and dependence indicators in all 3 countries than the usual brand measure (Table 2).

Coded Excerpt Cause:
Urges to smoke every or most days (vs. less often)
Coded Excerpt Effect:
Any menthol or capsule smoking in the past 30 days
Excerpt polarity:
+
Citation:

East, K. A., Reid, J. L., Burkhalter, R., Kock, L., Hyland, A., Fong, G. T., & Hammond, D. (2022). Evaluating the Outcomes of the Menthol Cigarette Ban in England by Comparing Menthol Cigarette Smoking Among Youth in England, Canada, and the US, 2018-2020. JAMA Network Open, 5(5), e2210029.

36
246
Nicotine Dependence → (S) Menthol use, PCS = 9.5

Any menthol or capsule smoking in the past 30 days was also associated with a greater number of consumption and dependence indicators in all 3 countries than the usual brand measure (Table 2).

Coded Excerpt Cause:
Cigarette smoking frequency
Coded Excerpt Effect:
Any menthol or capsule smoking in the past 30 days
Excerpt polarity:
+
Citation:

East, K. A., Reid, J. L., Burkhalter, R., Kock, L., Hyland, A., Fong, G. T., & Hammond, D. (2022). Evaluating the Outcomes of the Menthol Cigarette Ban in England by Comparing Menthol Cigarette Smoking Among Youth in England, Canada, and the US, 2018-2020. JAMA Network Open, 5(5), e2210029.

46
308
Comprehensiveness and reach of the menthol ban → (S) Availability of non-menthol tobacco products, PCS = 2

Non-flavored little cigars saw no significant change over time or between categories, and while vape pens were less available over time in Category 1 cities, there was no difference when compared with Category 2 cities.

Coded Excerpt Cause:
Flavored tobacco sales restriction law
Coded Excerpt Effect:
Non-Flavored Cigar Availability
Excerpt polarity:
=
Citation:

Holmes, L. M., Lempert, L. K., & Ling, P. M. (2022). Flavored Tobacco Sales Restrictions Reduce Tobacco Product Availability and Retailer Advertising. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(6), 3455.

53
340
Comprehensiveness and reach of the menthol ban → (S) Perceived health risks of tobacco, PCS = 1

Point prevalence cessation rates were similar between groups (online supplementary table 1) as were biochemical biomarkers of smoking (ie, exhaled CO and urinary cotinine concentrations), craving and withdrawal symptom severity, perceived health risks and support for a menthol ban (online supplementary table 2).

Coded Excerpt Cause:
Being a menthol smoker randomized to menthol group (vs non-menthol group)
Coded Excerpt Effect:
Perceived health risks from tobacco products
Excerpt polarity:
=
Citation:

Kotlyar, M., Shanley, R., Dufresne, S. R., Corcoran, G. A., Okuyemi, K. S., Mills, A. M., & Hatsukami, D. K. (2021b). Effects on time to lapse of switching menthol smokers to non-menthol cigarettes prior to a cessation attempt: a pilot study. Tobacco Control, 30(5), 574–577.

54
344
Comprehensiveness and reach of the menthol ban → (S) Perceived health risks of tobacco, PCS = 1

Over the 4-week period, the non-menthol group averaged modestly lower scores on all measures of perceived risk, with perceived risk of addiction (mean difference −1.38; 95% CI: −2.37 to −0.39; p = .01) and perceived risk of mouth cancer (mean difference −0.84; 95% CI: −1.66 to −0.03; p = .05) having the largest differences and the only measures for which the difference reached statistical significance (Table 1).

Coded Excerpt Cause:
Being a menthol smoker randomized to menthol group (vs non-menthol group)
Coded Excerpt Effect:
Perceived risk of addiction
Excerpt polarity:
+
Citation:

Kotlyar, M., Shanley, R., Dufresne, S. R., Corcoran, G. A., Okuyemi, K. S., Mills, A. M., & Hatsukami, D. K. (2021a). Effects on Smoking Behavior of Switching Menthol Smokers to Non-menthol Cigarettes. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 23(11), 1921–1927.

54
345
Comprehensiveness and reach of the menthol ban → (S) Perceived health risks of tobacco, PCS = 1

Over the 4-week period, the non-menthol group averaged modestly lower scores on all measures of perceived risk, with perceived risk of addiction (mean difference −1.38; 95% CI: −2.37 to −0.39; p = .01) and perceived risk of mouth cancer (mean difference −0.84; 95% CI: −1.66 to −0.03; p = .05) having the largest differences and the only measures for which the difference reached statistical significance (Table 1).

Coded Excerpt Cause:
Being a menthol smoker randomized to menthol group (vs non-menthol group)
Coded Excerpt Effect:
Perceived risk of mouth cancer
Excerpt polarity:
+
Citation:

Kotlyar, M., Shanley, R., Dufresne, S. R., Corcoran, G. A., Okuyemi, K. S., Mills, A. M., & Hatsukami, D. K. (2021a). Effects on Smoking Behavior of Switching Menthol Smokers to Non-menthol Cigarettes. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 23(11), 1921–1927.

55
359
Comprehensiveness and reach of the menthol ban → (S) Perceived health risks of tobacco, PCS = 1

Although ratings for ciga​rette perceived health risks were lower in the menthol cigarette absti​nence group than in the menthol cigarette non-abstinence group, ​​statistical significance was reached for only 1 measure (i.e., mouth ​​cancer) (Table 2).

Coded Excerpt Cause:
Continue smoking menthol cigarette condition (vs abstinence condition)
Coded Excerpt Effect:
Perceived risk of mouth cancer
Excerpt polarity:
+
Citation:

Kotlyar, M., Shanley, R., Dufresne, S. R., Corcoran, G. A., & Hatsukami, D. K. (2022a). Effect of restricting menthol flavored cigarettes or E-cigarettes on smoking behavior in menthol smokers. Preventive Medicine, 165, 107243.

56
382
Comprehensiveness and reach of the menthol ban → (S) Perceived health risks of tobacco, PCS = 1

No substantial differences among groups were found in measures of motivation or self-efficacy to quit smoking, in nicotine dependence, support for a ban on menthol in tobacco products, or on measures of perceived health risks from the products used

Coded Excerpt Cause:
Cigarette menthol ban group (vs no ban group)
Coded Excerpt Effect:
Perceived health risks from tobacco products
Excerpt polarity:
=
Citation:

Kotlyar, M., Shanley, R., Dufresne, S. R., Corcoran, G. A., & Hatsukami, D. K. (2022b). Effect on Tobacco Use and Subjective Measures of Including E-cigarettes in a Simulated Ban of Menthol in Combustible Cigarettes. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 24(9), 1448–1457.

56
383
Comprehensiveness and reach of the menthol ban → (S) Perceived health risks of tobacco, PCS = 1

No substantial differences among groups were found in measures of motivation or self-efficacy to quit smoking, in nicotine dependence, support for a ban on menthol in tobacco products, or on measures of perceived health risks from the products used

Coded Excerpt Cause:
Total Menthol Ban Group (vs menthol cigarette ban group)
Coded Excerpt Effect:
Perceived health risks from tobacco products
Excerpt polarity:
=
Citation:

Kotlyar, M., Shanley, R., Dufresne, S. R., Corcoran, G. A., & Hatsukami, D. K. (2022b). Effect on Tobacco Use and Subjective Measures of Including E-cigarettes in a Simulated Ban of Menthol in Combustible Cigarettes. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 24(9), 1448–1457.

56
384
Comprehensiveness and reach of the menthol ban → (S) Perceived health risks of tobacco, PCS = 1

No substantial differences among groups were found in measures of motivation or self-efficacy to quit smoking, in nicotine dependence, support for a ban on menthol in tobacco products, or on measures of perceived health risks from the products used

Coded Excerpt Cause:
Total menthol (cigarette and e-cigarette) ban group (vs no ban group)
Coded Excerpt Effect:
Perceived health risks from tobacco products
Excerpt polarity:
=
Citation:

Kotlyar, M., Shanley, R., Dufresne, S. R., Corcoran, G. A., & Hatsukami, D. K. (2022b). Effect on Tobacco Use and Subjective Measures of Including E-cigarettes in a Simulated Ban of Menthol in Combustible Cigarettes. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 24(9), 1448–1457.

58
394
Availability of menthol cigarettes → (S) Menthol use, PCS = 1

Further, we found a ​moderate negative correlation between the proportion of the menthol ​packs per census tract and the distance to exempt tobacco retailers ​(r = -0.66, p = .05). As the distance between census tracts and retailers ​increased, the proportion of menthol cigarettes decreased.

Coded Excerpt Cause:
Closeness to retailer exempt from menthol restriction
Coded Excerpt Effect:
Proportion of discarded menthol (vs non-menthol) packs
Excerpt polarity:
+
Citation:

Smiley, S. L., & Shin, H. (2024). Motivation to Quit Smoking Among Black Adults Residing in Los Angeles County Communities With Menthol Cigarette Sales Restrictions. Substance Use & Misuse, 59(5), 727–731.

59
399
Menthol use → (O) Support for flavor ban, PCS = -4

Menthol smokers were less likely to support a ​​ban on menthol (aOR = 0.18, 95% CI: 0.08–0.43)

Coded Excerpt Cause:
Menthol Smoker (Vs. Non-Menthol Smoker)
Coded Excerpt Effect:
Support for menthol ban
Excerpt polarity:
-
Citation:

Kyriakos, C. N., Fong, G. T., De Abreu Perez, C., Szklo, A. S., Driezen, P., Quah, A. C. K., Figueiredo, V. C., & Filippidis, F. T. (2022). Brazilian smokers are ready for the ban on flavour additives in tobacco to be implemented. Preventive Medicine, 160, 107074.

59
400
Menthol use → (O) Support for flavor ban, PCS = -4

Menthol smokers were less likely to support a ban on menthol (aOR = 0.18, 95% CI: 0.08–0.43) and on all additives (aOR = 0.24, 0.12–0.49)

Coded Excerpt Cause:
Menthol Smoker (Vs. Non-Menthol Smoker)
Coded Excerpt Effect:
Support for comprehensive flavor ban
Excerpt polarity:
-
Citation:

Kyriakos, C. N., Fong, G. T., De Abreu Perez, C., Szklo, A. S., Driezen, P., Quah, A. C. K., Figueiredo, V. C., & Filippidis, F. T. (2022). Brazilian smokers are ready for the ban on flavour additives in tobacco to be implemented. Preventive Medicine, 160, 107074.

59
401
Poor health outcomes → (S) Support for flavor ban, PCS = 1

Those who reported that additive-free ciga​rettes are less harmful were more likely to support a ban on additives ​​(aOR = 1.72, 1.18–2.50).

Coded Excerpt Cause:
Belief that cigarettes with additives (vs. additive-free) are more harmful
Coded Excerpt Effect:
Support for comprehensive flavor ban
Excerpt polarity:
+
Citation:

Kyriakos, C. N., Fong, G. T., De Abreu Perez, C., Szklo, A. S., Driezen, P., Quah, A. C. K., Figueiredo, V. C., & Filippidis, F. T. (2022). Brazilian smokers are ready for the ban on flavour additives in tobacco to be implemented. Preventive Medicine, 160, 107074.

74
532
Menthol use → (O) Support for flavor ban, PCS = -4

. Menthol smokers were more likely than ​otherwise similar nonmenthol smokers to dis​agree with a menthol ban (50.5% vs 31.2%; ​P

Coded Excerpt Cause:
Menthol Smoker (Vs. Non-Menthol Smoker)
Coded Excerpt Effect:
Support for menthol ban
Excerpt polarity:
-
Citation:

Pearson, J. L., Abrams, D. B., Niaura, R. S., Richardson, A., & Vallone, D. M. (2012). A Ban on Menthol Cigarettes: Impact on Public Opinion and Smokers’ Intention to Quit. American Journal of Public Health, 102(11), e107–e114.

74
545
Intentions to Quit → (S) Quit Attempts, PCS = 5

Menthol smokers with at least 1 recent quit ​attempt had twice the AOR as otherwise similar ​smokers who had not recently tried to quit of ​reporting they would rather quit than switch ​to a nonmenthol brand.

Coded Excerpt Cause:
Being menthol smoker with recent quit attempt (vs without recent quit attempt)
Coded Excerpt Effect:
Preferring to quit rather than switch to non-menthol post-menthol ban
Excerpt polarity:
+
Citation:

Pearson, J. L., Abrams, D. B., Niaura, R. S., Richardson, A., & Vallone, D. M. (2012). A Ban on Menthol Cigarettes: Impact on Public Opinion and Smokers’ Intention to Quit. American Journal of Public Health, 102(11), e107–e114.

82
607
Perceived health risks of tobacco → (S) Intentions to Quit, PCS = 1

Controlling for individual factors (i.e., sex, annual household income, highest education level attainment, age at cigarette initiation, and nicotine dependence), participants’ perception of menthol cigarettes as harmful/risky (B=14.69, p

Coded Excerpt Cause:
Perceiving menthol cigarettes as harmful/risky
Coded Excerpt Effect:
Motivation to quit
Excerpt polarity:
+
Citation:

Smiley, S. L., & Shin, H. (2024). Motivation to Quit Smoking Among Black Adults Residing in Los Angeles County Communities With Menthol Cigarette Sales Restrictions. Substance Use & Misuse, 59(5), 727–731.

84
619
Intentions to Quit → (S) Quit Attempts, PCS = 5

This study found that menthol bans likely have direct and indirect positive effects on ​​smoking cessation among menthol smokers. Menthol bans may have the greatest impact on ​​smoking cessation among those who are already motivated to quit before the implementation ​​of a menthol ban.

Coded Excerpt Cause:
Being a menthol smoker that is already motivated to quit pre-ban (vs not motivated)
Coded Excerpt Effect:
Quitting smoking post-menthol ban
Excerpt polarity:
+
Citation:

Soule, E. K., Dubray, J., Cohen, J. E., Schwartz, R., & Chaiton, M. (2021). Smoking cessation strategies used by former menthol cigarette smokers after a menthol ban. Addictive Behaviors, 123, 107046.

87
627
Comprehensiveness and reach of the menthol ban → (S) Retailer Compliance, PCS = 3

Retailers ​​were warned that they would be subject to permit suspension ​​and/or administrative penalties if they did not come into compli​ance and were offered the opportunity to self-certify compliance ​​by notifying the Department by text message when they had ​​eliminated flavoured tobacco product sales and display. Routine ​​inspections, which included the possibility of citations, started in ​​April 2019. The SFDPH issued 83 Notices of Correction and 4 ​​Notice of Violations between April 2019 and December 2019. ​​Between January 2019 and December 2019, compliance was ​​80%.

Coded Excerpt Cause:
Complete Flavored Tobacco Product Ban + Enforcement
Coded Excerpt Effect:
Retailer Compliance to a Flavored Tobacco Products Ban
Excerpt polarity:
+
Citation:

Vyas, P., Ling, P., Gordon, B., Callewaert, J., Dang, A., Smith, D., Chan, B., & Glantz, S. (2021). Compliance with San Francisco’s flavoured tobacco sales prohibition. Tobacco Control, 30(2), 227–230.

94
710
Menthol use → (O) Support for flavor ban, PCS = -4

“males, older adults, Blacks and Hispanics, those with higher levels of educational attainment, those with lower levels of household income, those with a shorter history of smoking, those who used nonmenthol cigarettes or nonflavored cigars, those who smoked less than daily, those who had moderate or high levels of dependence on smoking, and those who did not obtain cigarettes or cigars solely from local retailers were all more likely to be supportive of both bans compared with their counterparts.”

Coded Excerpt Cause:
Being a menthol or flavor user (vs un-flavored tobacco user)
Coded Excerpt Effect:
Support for menthol cigarette and flavored cigar ban
Excerpt polarity:
-
Citation:

Yang, Y., Lindblom, E. N., Ward, K. D., & Salloum, R. G. (2022). How Smokers of Menthol Cigarettes and Flavored Cigars Might Respond to FDA’s Proposed Bans. Nicotine and Tobacco Research, 24(10), 1645–1653.

98
759
Nicotine Dependence → (S) Menthol use, PCS = 9.5

Across the surveyed countries, menthol cigarette smokers tended to be younger, more likely to be female, better educated, living with a higher household income, and smoking fewer cigarettes.

Coded Excerpt Cause:
Cigarette smoking frequency
Coded Excerpt Effect:
Menthol Cigarette Smoking
Excerpt polarity:
-
Citation:

Zatoński, M., Herbeć, A., Zatoński, W., Przewoźniak, K., Janik-Koncewicz, K., Mons, U., Fong, G., Demjén, T., Tountas, Y., Trofor, A., Fernández, E., McNeill, A., Willemsen, M., Hummel, K., Quah, A., Kyriakos, C., & Vardavas, C. (2018). Characterising smokers of menthol and flavoured cigarettes,their attitudes towards tobacco regulation, and the anticipatedimpact of the Tobacco Products Directive on their smoking andquitting behaviours: The EUREST-PLUS ITC Europe Surveys. Tobacco Induced Diseases, 16(2).

98
760
Menthol use → (O) Support for flavor ban, PCS = -4

All groups were predominantly ​​supportive of a smoking ban in restaurants, with ​​highest support reported by menthol smokers ​​(73.5%), and lowest by other flavoured cigarette ​​smokers (63.3%). Almost half of all smokers ​​supported the ban on smoking in bars and pubs, ​​with the support varying significantly by the type ​​of cigarette smoked (56.1% among menthol, 45.4% ​​among other flavoured cigarette smokers).

Coded Excerpt Cause:
Menthol Smoker (vs other flavor smoker)
Coded Excerpt Effect:
Support for ban on smoking in restaurants
Excerpt polarity:
+
Citation:

Zatoński, M., Herbeć, A., Zatoński, W., Przewoźniak, K., Janik-Koncewicz, K., Mons, U., Fong, G., Demjén, T., Tountas, Y., Trofor, A., Fernández, E., McNeill, A., Willemsen, M., Hummel, K., Quah, A., Kyriakos, C., & Vardavas, C. (2018). Characterising smokers of menthol and flavoured cigarettes,their attitudes towards tobacco regulation, and the anticipatedimpact of the Tobacco Products Directive on their smoking andquitting behaviours: The EUREST-PLUS ITC Europe Surveys. Tobacco Induced Diseases, 16(2).

98
761
Menthol use → (O) Support for flavor ban, PCS = -4

The most divisive issue between menthol smokers ​​and other smokers was that of banning additives, ​​including flavourings, in cigarettes, with only 25.1% ​​of menthol smokers supporting such a law, compared ​​to 49.9% of other flavoured cigarette smokers.

Coded Excerpt Cause:
Menthol Smoker (vs other flavor smoker)
Coded Excerpt Effect:
Support for banning additives in cigarettes
Excerpt polarity:
-
Citation:

Zatoński, M., Herbeć, A., Zatoński, W., Przewoźniak, K., Janik-Koncewicz, K., Mons, U., Fong, G., Demjén, T., Tountas, Y., Trofor, A., Fernández, E., McNeill, A., Willemsen, M., Hummel, K., Quah, A., Kyriakos, C., & Vardavas, C. (2018). Characterising smokers of menthol and flavoured cigarettes,their attitudes towards tobacco regulation, and the anticipatedimpact of the Tobacco Products Directive on their smoking andquitting behaviours: The EUREST-PLUS ITC Europe Surveys. Tobacco Induced Diseases, 16(2).

104
796
Strength/funding of tobacco control programs → (S) Comprehensiveness and reach of the menthol ban, PCS = 4

Of 539 local jurisdictions in California, 24 cities or counties had adopted a ​local flavor ordinance by January 1, 2019, which represents an 11-fold in​crease from two jurisdictions that adopted ordinances prior to the April 2015 ​campaign start. The first comprehensive flavor ordinance was adopted by ​Unincorporated Yolo County in October 2016. By the end of 2017, only two ​comprehensive flavor ordinances had been adopted in California. In 2018, ​four more comprehensive ordinances passed, so that by January 1, 2019, one ​in four local flavor ordinances were comprehensive (see Table 2).

Coded Excerpt Cause:
California's Flavored Tobacco Products Campaign
Coded Excerpt Effect:
Local Flavor Ordinance
Excerpt polarity:
+
Citation:

Andersen-Rodgers, E., Zhang, X., Vuong, T. D., Hendrix, L., Edora, C., Williams, R. J., Groves, L., Roeseler, A., Rogers, T., Voelker, D. H., Schleicher, N. C., Johnson, T. O., & Henriksen, L. (2021). Are California’s Local Flavored Tobacco Sales Restrictions Effective in Reducing the Retail Availability of Flavored Tobacco Products? A Multicomponent Evaluation. Evaluation Review, 45(3–4), 134–165.

104
803
Comprehensiveness and reach of the menthol ban → (O) Availability of flavor-ambiguous menthol cigarettes, PCS = -0.5

While products with ambiguous flavor names were also ​significantly less prevalent in flavor ordinance jurisdictions compared to ​matched no-ordinance jurisdictions (cigarillo/cigar wraps: 53.9% vs. ​78.1%)

Coded Excerpt Cause:
Local Flavor Ordinance
Coded Excerpt Effect:
Product Availibility (Flavored Tobacco Products w/ambigous names/descriptors) post ban
Excerpt polarity:
-
Citation:

Andersen-Rodgers, E., Zhang, X., Vuong, T. D., Hendrix, L., Edora, C., Williams, R. J., Groves, L., Roeseler, A., Rogers, T., Voelker, D. H., Schleicher, N. C., Johnson, T. O., & Henriksen, L. (2021). Are California’s Local Flavored Tobacco Sales Restrictions Effective in Reducing the Retail Availability of Flavored Tobacco Products? A Multicomponent Evaluation. Evaluation Review, 45(3–4), 134–165.

105
814
Comprehensiveness and reach of the menthol ban → (S) Availability of non-menthol tobacco products, PCS = 2

In Minneapolis between rounds 1 and 2, the average per cent of flavoured tobacco inventory per store decreased significantly while the average per cent of unflavoured tobacco inventory increased significantly

Coded Excerpt Cause:
Restriction of menthol sales to adult only tobacco shops
Coded Excerpt Effect:
Product Availability (unflavored tobacco)
Excerpt polarity:
+
Citation:

Brock, B., Carlson, S. C., Leizinger, A., D’Silva, J., Matter, C. M., & Schillo, B. A. (2019). A tale of two cities: exploring the retail impact of flavoured tobacco restrictions in the twin cities of Minneapolis and Saint Paul, Minnesota. Tobacco Control, 28(2), 176–180.

105
818
Comprehensiveness and reach of the menthol ban → (S) Availability of non-menthol tobacco products, PCS = 2

In Saint Paul, the average percentages of flavoured and menthol tobacco inventory per store decreased significantly between rounds 1 and 2 while the percentage of unflavoured tobacco inventory increased.

Coded Excerpt Cause:
Restriction of menthol sales to adult only tobacco shops
Coded Excerpt Effect:
Product Availability (unflavored tobacco)
Excerpt polarity:
+
Citation:

Brock, B., Carlson, S. C., Leizinger, A., D’Silva, J., Matter, C. M., & Schillo, B. A. (2019). A tale of two cities: exploring the retail impact of flavoured tobacco restrictions in the twin cities of Minneapolis and Saint Paul, Minnesota. Tobacco Control, 28(2), 176–180.

105
807
Comprehensiveness and reach of the menthol ban → (S) Retailer Compliance, PCS = 3

They did another round of data gathering in Minneapolis (but not St Paul) because compliance with new ban was so bad

Coded Excerpt Cause:
Restriction of menthol sales to adult only tobacco shops
Coded Excerpt Effect:
Retailer Compliance to a Flavored Tobacco Products Ban
Excerpt polarity:
+
Citation:

Brock, B., Carlson, S. C., Leizinger, A., D’Silva, J., Matter, C. M., & Schillo, B. A. (2019). A tale of two cities: exploring the retail impact of flavoured tobacco restrictions in the twin cities of Minneapolis and Saint Paul, Minnesota. Tobacco Control, 28(2), 176–180.

105
809
Comprehensiveness and reach of the menthol ban → (O) Availability of flavor-ambiguous menthol cigarettes, PCS = -0.5

In Minneapolis between rounds 1 and 3, there was a significant ​​reduction in the per cent of stores that sold tobacco with ambig​uous flavours names such as ‘TaTa’ and ‘Blue’ (80.5% vs 61.5%)

Coded Excerpt Cause:
Restriction of menthol sales to adult only tobacco shops
Coded Excerpt Effect:
Product Availability (tobacco with ambiguous flavor names)
Excerpt polarity:
-
Citation:

Brock, B., Carlson, S. C., Leizinger, A., D’Silva, J., Matter, C. M., & Schillo, B. A. (2019). A tale of two cities: exploring the retail impact of flavoured tobacco restrictions in the twin cities of Minneapolis and Saint Paul, Minnesota. Tobacco Control, 28(2), 176–180.

105
810
Comprehensiveness and reach of the menthol ban → (O) Availability of flavor-ambiguous menthol cigarettes, PCS = -0.5

In Saint Paul, there was no significant change in the per cent of stores that sold products with ambiguous flavour names (67.6% vs 81.1%).

Coded Excerpt Cause:
Restriction of menthol sales to adult only tobacco shops
Coded Excerpt Effect:
Product Availability (tobacco with ambiguous flavor names)
Excerpt polarity:
=
Citation:

Brock, B., Carlson, S. C., Leizinger, A., D’Silva, J., Matter, C. M., & Schillo, B. A. (2019). A tale of two cities: exploring the retail impact of flavoured tobacco restrictions in the twin cities of Minneapolis and Saint Paul, Minnesota. Tobacco Control, 28(2), 176–180.

106
823
Comprehensiveness and reach of the menthol ban → (S) Retailer Compliance, PCS = 3

In addition, the NYC Department of Finance’s (DOF) ​​Sheriff’s Office regularly inspected tobacco retailers for ​​compliance with the city’s cigarette excise tax, including ​​searches of retailers’ premises for hidden packs of untaxed ​​cigarettes. Stakeholders reported that DOF found flavored ​​cigars hidden with untaxed cigarettes

Coded Excerpt Cause:
Flavored non-cigarette tobacco sales restriction law (e-cigs, menthol, tobacco bars exempted)
Coded Excerpt Effect:
Retailer following restrictions (vs attempting to circumvent restrictions)
Excerpt polarity:
-
Citation:

Brown, E. M., Rogers, T., Eggers, M. E., Cavazos, M. L., O’Brien, M. S., McCrae, T., Farley, S. M., & Schroth, K. R. J. (2019). Implementation of the New York City Policy Restricting Sales of Flavored Non-Cigarette Tobacco Products. Health Education & Behavior, 46(5), 782–789.

112
862
Comprehensiveness and reach of the menthol ban → (O) Availability of flavor-ambiguous menthol cigarettes, PCS = -0.5

No products with ambiguous names or replacement menthol tobacco were observed in the overall sample.

Coded Excerpt Cause:
Restriction of menthol sales to adult only tobacco shops
Coded Excerpt Effect:
Product Availability (tobacco with ambiguous flavor names)
Excerpt polarity:
=
Citation:

D’Silva, J., Moze, J., Kingsbury, J. H., Lien, R. K., Matter, C. M., Brock, B., & Akom, A. (2021). Local sales restrictions significantly reduce the availability of menthol tobacco: findings from four Minnesota cities. Tobacco Control, 30(5), 492–497.

112
863
Comprehensiveness and reach of the menthol ban → (O) Availability of flavor-ambiguous menthol cigarettes, PCS = -0.5

No products with ambiguous names or replacement menthol tobacco were observed in the overall sample.

Coded Excerpt Cause:
Restriction of menthol sales to adult only tobacco shops
Coded Excerpt Effect:
Product Availability (replacement menthol tobacco) in intervention stores (vs exempt stores)
Excerpt polarity:
=
Citation:

D’Silva, J., Moze, J., Kingsbury, J. H., Lien, R. K., Matter, C. M., Brock, B., & Akom, A. (2021). Local sales restrictions significantly reduce the availability of menthol tobacco: findings from four Minnesota cities. Tobacco Control, 30(5), 492–497.

128
1020
Comprehensiveness and reach of the menthol ban → (S) Retailers dropping tobacco licenses, PCS = 2

A total of 7458 tobacco retail licenses were issued during ​October 2018-August 2019 (pre-flavor ban period), and a total ​of 7026 tobacco retail licenses were issued during October ​2020-August 2021 (post-flavor ban period), representing an ​overall 5.8% decline in licenses.

Coded Excerpt Cause:
Comprehensive Flavored tobacco ban
Coded Excerpt Effect:
Total tobacco retail licenses issued (renewal and new) Post Ban
Excerpt polarity:
-
Citation:

Nali, M. C., Purushothaman, V., Li, Z., Cuomo, R., & Mackey, T. K. (2023). Assessing the Impact of the Massachusetts Temporary Flavor Ban on Licensed Tobacco Retailers. Tobacco Use Insights, 16, 1179173X231192821.

128
1021
Comprehensiveness and reach of the menthol ban → (S) Retailers dropping tobacco licenses, PCS = 2

While the number of existing ​retailers that were issued renewed licenses increased by 9.5% ​(5627 during October 2018-August 2019 and 6163 during ​October 2020-August 2021)

Coded Excerpt Cause:
Comprehensive Flavored tobacco ban
Coded Excerpt Effect:
Renewal of Tobacco retail licenses Post Ban
Excerpt polarity:
+
Citation:

Nali, M. C., Purushothaman, V., Li, Z., Cuomo, R., & Mackey, T. K. (2023). Assessing the Impact of the Massachusetts Temporary Flavor Ban on Licensed Tobacco Retailers. Tobacco Use Insights, 16, 1179173X231192821.

128
1022
Comprehensiveness and reach of the menthol ban → (S) Retailers dropping tobacco licenses, PCS = 2

the number of new tobacco retail ​licenses issued decreased by 52.9% (1831 during October 2018- ​August 2019 and 863 during October 2020-August 2021).

Coded Excerpt Cause:
Comprehensive Flavored tobacco ban
Coded Excerpt Effect:
New tobacco retail licenses issued Post Ban
Excerpt polarity:
-
Citation:

Nali, M. C., Purushothaman, V., Li, Z., Cuomo, R., & Mackey, T. K. (2023). Assessing the Impact of the Massachusetts Temporary Flavor Ban on Licensed Tobacco Retailers. Tobacco Use Insights, 16, 1179173X231192821.

128
1023
Comprehensiveness and reach of the menthol ban → (S) Retailers dropping tobacco licenses, PCS = 2

Overall, the decrease in total tobacco retail license ​density across counties in the state of Massachusetts was 7.78 ​per 100,000 population.

Coded Excerpt Cause:
Comprehensive Flavored tobacco ban
Coded Excerpt Effect:
Total Tobacco Retailer Density Post Ban
Excerpt polarity:
-
Citation:

Nali, M. C., Purushothaman, V., Li, Z., Cuomo, R., & Mackey, T. K. (2023). Assessing the Impact of the Massachusetts Temporary Flavor Ban on Licensed Tobacco Retailers. Tobacco Use Insights, 16, 1179173X231192821.

128
1024
Comprehensiveness and reach of the menthol ban → (S) Retailers dropping tobacco licenses, PCS = 2

Overall, ​the decrease in new tobacco retail license density across counties ​in the state of Massachusetts was 17.15 per 100,000 population.

Coded Excerpt Cause:
Comprehensive Flavored tobacco ban
Coded Excerpt Effect:
New Tobacco License Density Post Ban
Excerpt polarity:
-
Citation:

Nali, M. C., Purushothaman, V., Li, Z., Cuomo, R., & Mackey, T. K. (2023). Assessing the Impact of the Massachusetts Temporary Flavor Ban on Licensed Tobacco Retailers. Tobacco Use Insights, 16, 1179173X231192821.

133
1070
Comprehensiveness and reach of the menthol ban → (S) Retailer Compliance, PCS = 3

Between the first and last rounds of compliance checks, ​violations for sale of tobacco to a minor decreased by 12 percent​age points to 2%

Coded Excerpt Cause:
Flavored tobacco sales restrictions (except menthol/in tobacco bars) (Intensified enforcement)
Coded Excerpt Effect:
Retailer Compliance to a Flavored Tobacco Products Ban
Excerpt polarity:
+
Citation:

Pearlman, D. N., Arnold, J. A., Guardino, G. A., & Welsh, E. B. (2019). Advancing Tobacco Control Through Point of Sale Policies, Providence, Rhode Island. Preventing Chronic Disease, 16, 180614.

138
1111
Comprehensiveness and reach of the menthol ban → (S) Availability of non-menthol tobacco products, PCS = 2

In Providence, trends in the percentage of unique explicit-named flavoured cigarillo UPCs (‘sales share’) appear to drop from the prepolicy to the postpolicy period while trends in the share of concept-named and tobacco flavoured cigarillo UPCs appear to increase over these periods

Coded Excerpt Cause:
Flavored non-cigarette tobacco (excluding mint/menthol flavor) sales restriction
Coded Excerpt Effect:
Product Availability (tobacco flavored/unflavored cigarillos)
Excerpt polarity:
+
Citation:

Rogers, T., Gammon, D. G., Coats, E. M., Nonnemaker, J. M., & Xu, X. (2022). Changes in cigarillo availability following implementation of a local flavoured tobacco sales restriction. Tobacco Control, 31(6), 707–713.

138
1115
Comprehensiveness and reach of the menthol ban → (S) Availability of non-menthol tobacco products, PCS = 2

Our analysis revealed no association between policy imple​mentation and changes in the number of or trends in avail​able tobacco-named cigarillo UPCs

Coded Excerpt Cause:
Flavored non-cigarette tobacco (excluding mint/menthol flavor) sales restriction
Coded Excerpt Effect:
Product Availability (tobacco-named cigarillo)
Excerpt polarity:
=
Citation:

Rogers, T., Gammon, D. G., Coats, E. M., Nonnemaker, J. M., & Xu, X. (2022). Changes in cigarillo availability following implementation of a local flavoured tobacco sales restriction. Tobacco Control, 31(6), 707–713.

139
1117
Comprehensiveness and reach of the menthol ban → (S) Retailers dropping tobacco licenses, PCS = 2

Compared with a national comprehen​sive FTP retailer ban, which would eliminate FTP sales, ​​a tobacco specialty store only exemption, on average, ​​would result in 6.02% of FTP retailers (0.23 FTP retailers ​​per square mile) remaining per Census tract. If both ​​tobacco specialty stores and alcohol outlets were exempt, ​​on average 14.25% of FTP retailers (0.57 FTP retailers ​​per square mile) would remain per Census tract.

Coded Excerpt Cause:
Comprehensive flavored tobacco product ban (vs exemptions for certain retailer types)
Coded Excerpt Effect:
Number of flavored tobacco product retailers per 100,000 group members
Excerpt polarity:
-
Citation:

Schillo, B. A., Benson, A. F., Czaplicki, L., Anesetti-Rothermel, A., Kierstead, E. C., Simpson, R., Phelps, N. C., Herman, P., Zhao, C., & Rose, S. W. (2020). Modelling retailer-based exemptions in flavoured tobacco sales restrictions: national estimates on the impact of product availability. BMJ Open, 10(11), e040490.

139
1121
Comprehensiveness and reach of the menthol ban → (S) Retailers dropping tobacco licenses, PCS = 2

If no FTP sales restrictions existed nationwide (ie, ‘status quo’), the overall FTP availability across Census tracts was 20.88 per 100000 total population (figure 1A). Under a national FTP sales restriction that exempts tobacco specialty stores only, the average FTP availability across Census tracts would reduce to 1.49 FTP retailers per 100000 population (figure 1B). Exempting both tobacco specialty stores and alcohol outlets would result in an average of 3.77 FTP retailers per 100000 population

Coded Excerpt Cause:
Flavored tobacco products ban, tobacco specialty store exempted (vs no exemptions)
Coded Excerpt Effect:
Number of flavored tobacco product retailers per 100,000 group members
Excerpt polarity:
+
Citation:

Schillo, B. A., Benson, A. F., Czaplicki, L., Anesetti-Rothermel, A., Kierstead, E. C., Simpson, R., Phelps, N. C., Herman, P., Zhao, C., & Rose, S. W. (2020). Modelling retailer-based exemptions in flavoured tobacco sales restrictions: national estimates on the impact of product availability. BMJ Open, 10(11), e040490.

139
1122
Comprehensiveness and reach of the menthol ban → (S) Retailers dropping tobacco licenses, PCS = 2

If no FTP sales restrictions existed nationwide (ie, ‘status quo’), the overall FTP availability across Census tracts was 20.88 per 100000 total population (figure 1A). Under a national FTP sales restriction that exempts tobacco specialty stores only, the average FTP availability across Census tracts would reduce to 1.49 FTP retailers per 100000 population (figure 1B). Exempting both tobacco specialty stores and alcohol outlets would result in an average of 3.77 FTP retailers per 100000 population

Coded Excerpt Cause:
Flavored tobacco products ban, tobacco specialty store, alcohol outlets exempted (vs tobacco specialty store exemption)
Coded Excerpt Effect:
Number of flavored tobacco product retailers per 100,000 group members
Excerpt polarity:
+
Citation:

Schillo, B. A., Benson, A. F., Czaplicki, L., Anesetti-Rothermel, A., Kierstead, E. C., Simpson, R., Phelps, N. C., Herman, P., Zhao, C., & Rose, S. W. (2020). Modelling retailer-based exemptions in flavoured tobacco sales restrictions: national estimates on the impact of product availability. BMJ Open, 10(11), e040490.

141
1141
Comprehensiveness and reach of the menthol ban → (S) Retailer Compliance, PCS = 3

When stratifying by store type, there was a statistically significant greater decrease in any FTP availability among policy-area convenience stores than among comparison-area convenience stores (p

Coded Excerpt Cause:
Ban on flavored tobacco product sales within 500 feet of schools
Coded Excerpt Effect:
Retailer compliance with policy (vs non compliance w policy)
Excerpt polarity:
+
Citation:

Slater, S., Pugach, O., Rogers, T., Barker, D. C., Ross, A., Tworek, C., Ridgeway, W., Dart, L., & Engstrom, M. C. (2023). Changes in Retail Tobacco Product Availability Following a Chicago City Ordinance Restricting Sales of Menthol and Other Flavored Tobacco Products Near Schools. Health Education & Behavior, 50(5), 693–702.

No results found.

Oops! It seems we couldn't find any results for your search. Please try different filters.