Cited references for this diagram

Showing
X
of
X
Clear fields
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Click to enable scroll
Ref
ID
Cause  → Effect
Excerpt
DOI Link
10
77
Strength/funding of tobacco control programs → (S) Policy enforcement, PCS = 3

Facilitators included strong city council support, leadership from impacted communities, community awareness-building campaigns, and understanding tobacco industry counter-tactics

Coded Excerpt Cause:
Involvement of leadership from flavored(incl menthol) tobacco impacted communities
Coded Excerpt Effect:
Effectiveness of menthol restriction policy
Excerpt polarity:
+
Citation:

Bosma, L. M., D’Silva, J., Moze, J., Matter, C., Kingsbury, J. H., & Brock, B. (2021). Restricting Sales of Menthol Tobacco Products: Lessons Learned from Policy Passage and Implementation in Minneapolis, St. Paul, and Duluth, Minnesota. Health Equity, 5(1), 439–447.

10
78
Strength/funding of tobacco control programs → (S) Policy enforcement, PCS = 3

Facilitators included strong city council support, leadership from impacted communities, community awareness-building campaigns, and understanding tobacco industry counter-tactics

Coded Excerpt Cause:
Community awareness building campaigns
Coded Excerpt Effect:
Effectiveness of menthol restriction policy
Excerpt polarity:
+
Citation:

Bosma, L. M., D’Silva, J., Moze, J., Matter, C., Kingsbury, J. H., & Brock, B. (2021). Restricting Sales of Menthol Tobacco Products: Lessons Learned from Policy Passage and Implementation in Minneapolis, St. Paul, and Duluth, Minnesota. Health Equity, 5(1), 439–447.

10
79
Strength/funding of tobacco control programs → (S) Policy enforcement, PCS = 3

Facilitators included strong city council support, leadership from impacted communities, community awareness-building campaigns, and understanding tobacco industry counter-tactics

Coded Excerpt Cause:
Understanding tobacco industry counter-tactics
Coded Excerpt Effect:
Effectiveness of menthol restriction policy
Excerpt polarity:
+
Citation:

Bosma, L. M., D’Silva, J., Moze, J., Matter, C., Kingsbury, J. H., & Brock, B. (2021). Restricting Sales of Menthol Tobacco Products: Lessons Learned from Policy Passage and Implementation in Minneapolis, St. Paul, and Duluth, Minnesota. Health Equity, 5(1), 439–447.

34
214
Menthol cigarette user frustration about limited access to menthol → (O) Support for flavor ban, PCS = -2

There was also concern ​​that cigarettes would cost more at tobacco shops. They’re already a dollar and something higher than… the [con​venience] stores. So it’s like they’re trying to take advantage and ​​I don’t like being taken advantage of. (Female, 43)

Coded Excerpt Cause:
Concern that menthol restriction would cause prices to rise
Coded Excerpt Effect:
Support for menthol ban
Excerpt polarity:
-
Citation:

D’Silva, J., O’Gara, E., Fryer, C. S., & Boyle, R. G. (2021). “Because There’s Just Something About That Menthol”: Exploring African American Smokers’ Perspectives on Menthol Smoking and Local Menthol Sales Restrictions. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 23(2), 357–363.

34
215
Menthol cigarette user frustration about limited access to menthol → (O) Support for flavor ban, PCS = -2

Some felt they were being unfairly treated and did not under​stand why restrictions singled out menthol and did not apply to non-menthol tobacco products. … if you take the menthol but you leave the regular that’s just ​​stupid. ... and I ain’t gonna lie, it gave me an attitude. How are ​​you gonna take the menthol but you gonna leave everybody else a ​​cigarette? It just don’t make no sense. (Female, 45)

Coded Excerpt Cause:
perception of unfair treatment of menthol vs non-menthol
Coded Excerpt Effect:
Support for menthol ban
Excerpt polarity:
-
Citation:

D’Silva, J., O’Gara, E., Fryer, C. S., & Boyle, R. G. (2021). “Because There’s Just Something About That Menthol”: Exploring African American Smokers’ Perspectives on Menthol Smoking and Local Menthol Sales Restrictions. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 23(2), 357–363.

34
213
Availability of menthol cigarettes → (O) Menthol cigarette user frustration about limited access to menthol, PCS = -1

Initially, smokers reacted ​​negatively because they were frustrated with the inconvenience of ​​having to travel to find menthol cigarettes.

Coded Excerpt Cause:
Not feeling inconvenienced (vs. feeling inconvenienced) to travel to buy menthol cigarettes
Coded Excerpt Effect:
Support for menthol ban
Excerpt polarity:
+
Citation:

D’Silva, J., O’Gara, E., Fryer, C. S., & Boyle, R. G. (2021). “Because There’s Just Something About That Menthol”: Exploring African American Smokers’ Perspectives on Menthol Smoking and Local Menthol Sales Restrictions. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 23(2), 357–363.

53
336
Availability of menthol cigarettes → (O) Menthol cigarette users quitting altogether, PCS = -3.5

Point prevalence cessation rates were similar between groups

Coded Excerpt Cause:
Being a menthol smoker randomized to menthol group (vs non-menthol group)
Coded Excerpt Effect:
Smoking cessation rate
Excerpt polarity:
=
Citation:

Kotlyar, M., Shanley, R., Dufresne, S. R., Corcoran, G. A., Okuyemi, K. S., Mills, A. M., & Hatsukami, D. K. (2021b). Effects on time to lapse of switching menthol smokers to non-menthol cigarettes prior to a cessation attempt: a pilot study. Tobacco Control, 30(5), 574–577.

58
394
Availability of menthol cigarettes → (S) Menthol use, PCS = 1

Further, we found a ​moderate negative correlation between the proportion of the menthol ​packs per census tract and the distance to exempt tobacco retailers ​(r = -0.66, p = .05). As the distance between census tracts and retailers ​increased, the proportion of menthol cigarettes decreased.

Coded Excerpt Cause:
Closeness to retailer exempt from menthol restriction
Coded Excerpt Effect:
Proportion of discarded menthol (vs non-menthol) packs
Excerpt polarity:
+
Citation:

Smiley, S. L., & Shin, H. (2024). Motivation to Quit Smoking Among Black Adults Residing in Los Angeles County Communities With Menthol Cigarette Sales Restrictions. Substance Use & Misuse, 59(5), 727–731.

59
399
Menthol use → (O) Support for flavor ban, PCS = -4

Menthol smokers were less likely to support a ​​ban on menthol (aOR = 0.18, 95% CI: 0.08–0.43)

Coded Excerpt Cause:
Menthol Smoker (Vs. Non-Menthol Smoker)
Coded Excerpt Effect:
Support for menthol ban
Excerpt polarity:
-
Citation:

Kyriakos, C. N., Fong, G. T., De Abreu Perez, C., Szklo, A. S., Driezen, P., Quah, A. C. K., Figueiredo, V. C., & Filippidis, F. T. (2022). Brazilian smokers are ready for the ban on flavour additives in tobacco to be implemented. Preventive Medicine, 160, 107074.

59
400
Menthol use → (O) Support for flavor ban, PCS = -4

Menthol smokers were less likely to support a ban on menthol (aOR = 0.18, 95% CI: 0.08–0.43) and on all additives (aOR = 0.24, 0.12–0.49)

Coded Excerpt Cause:
Menthol Smoker (Vs. Non-Menthol Smoker)
Coded Excerpt Effect:
Support for comprehensive flavor ban
Excerpt polarity:
-
Citation:

Kyriakos, C. N., Fong, G. T., De Abreu Perez, C., Szklo, A. S., Driezen, P., Quah, A. C. K., Figueiredo, V. C., & Filippidis, F. T. (2022). Brazilian smokers are ready for the ban on flavour additives in tobacco to be implemented. Preventive Medicine, 160, 107074.

65
441
Availability of menthol cigarettes → (O) Menthol cigarette users quitting altogether, PCS = -3.5

Under a menthol ban, the percent that would remain combustible users was expected to drop from 80.6% to 50.5% (40.3% nonmenthol cigarettes, 6.5% illicit menthol cigarettes, and 3.7% nonmenthol cigars), a 30.1 percentage point (pp) reduction.

Coded Excerpt Cause:
Hypothetical Menthol Cigarette Ban
Coded Excerpt Effect:
Quitting smoking post-menthol ban
Excerpt polarity:
+
Citation:

Levy, D. T., Cadham, C. J., Sanchez-Romero, L. M., Knoll, M., Travis, N., Yuan, Z., Li, Y., Mistry, R., Douglas, C. E., Tam, J., Sertkaya, A., Warner, K. E., & Meza, R. (2021). An Expert Elicitation on the Effects of a Ban on Menthol Cigarettes and Cigars in the United States. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 23(11), 1911–1920.

65
447
Availability of menthol cigarettes → (O) Menthol cigarette users quitting altogether, PCS = -3.5

Under a menthol ban, the percent that would remain combustible users was expected to drop from 80.6% to 50.5% (40.3% nonmenthol cigarettes, 6.5% illicit menthol cigarettes, and 3.7% nonmenthol cigars), a 30.1 percentage point (pp) reduction. About a quarter (a 15.6 pp increase) were expected to switch to NNDP use, while 3.7% would switch to smokeless tobacco and 21.7% would quit all tobacco use.

Coded Excerpt Cause:
Hypothetical Menthol Cigarette Ban
Coded Excerpt Effect:
Quit all tobacco use
Excerpt polarity:
+
Citation:

Levy, D. T., Cadham, C. J., Sanchez-Romero, L. M., Knoll, M., Travis, N., Yuan, Z., Li, Y., Mistry, R., Douglas, C. E., Tam, J., Sertkaya, A., Warner, K. E., & Meza, R. (2021). An Expert Elicitation on the Effects of a Ban on Menthol Cigarettes and Cigars in the United States. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 23(11), 1911–1920.

65
456
Availability of menthol cigarettes → (O) Menthol cigarette users quitting altogether, PCS = -3.5

Under a ban, experts expected 55.1% to remain combustible users (45.7% nonmenthol cigarettes, 5.7% illicit menthol cigarettes, and 3.7% nonmenthol cigars), resulting in a reduction in combustible product use of 20.1 pp. One-fifth (20.0%) were expected to switch to NNDP use (a 10.3 pp increase from the Status Quo), while 2.4% would switch to smokeless tobacco (a 0.2 pp decrease) and 22.5% quit all tobacco use (10 pp increase).

Coded Excerpt Cause:
Hypothetical Menthol Cigarette Ban
Coded Excerpt Effect:
Quit all tobacco use
Excerpt polarity:
+
Citation:

Levy, D. T., Cadham, C. J., Sanchez-Romero, L. M., Knoll, M., Travis, N., Yuan, Z., Li, Y., Mistry, R., Douglas, C. E., Tam, J., Sertkaya, A., Warner, K. E., & Meza, R. (2021). An Expert Elicitation on the Effects of a Ban on Menthol Cigarettes and Cigars in the United States. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 23(11), 1911–1920.

74
532
Menthol use → (O) Support for flavor ban, PCS = -4

. Menthol smokers were more likely than ​otherwise similar nonmenthol smokers to dis​agree with a menthol ban (50.5% vs 31.2%; ​P

Coded Excerpt Cause:
Menthol Smoker (Vs. Non-Menthol Smoker)
Coded Excerpt Effect:
Support for menthol ban
Excerpt polarity:
-
Citation:

Pearson, J. L., Abrams, D. B., Niaura, R. S., Richardson, A., & Vallone, D. M. (2012). A Ban on Menthol Cigarettes: Impact on Public Opinion and Smokers’ Intention to Quit. American Journal of Public Health, 102(11), e107–e114.

84
618
Availability of menthol cigarettes → (O) Menthol cigarette users quitting altogether, PCS = -3.5

Approximately one-third (30.7%) perceived ​​that the menthol ban helped them with smoking cessation.

Coded Excerpt Cause:
Menthol ban
Coded Excerpt Effect:
Quitting smoking post-menthol ban
Excerpt polarity:
+
Citation:

Soule, E. K., Dubray, J., Cohen, J. E., Schwartz, R., & Chaiton, M. (2021). Smoking cessation strategies used by former menthol cigarette smokers after a menthol ban. Addictive Behaviors, 123, 107046.

94
710
Menthol use → (O) Support for flavor ban, PCS = -4

“males, older adults, Blacks and Hispanics, those with higher levels of educational attainment, those with lower levels of household income, those with a shorter history of smoking, those who used nonmenthol cigarettes or nonflavored cigars, those who smoked less than daily, those who had moderate or high levels of dependence on smoking, and those who did not obtain cigarettes or cigars solely from local retailers were all more likely to be supportive of both bans compared with their counterparts.”

Coded Excerpt Cause:
Being a menthol or flavor user (vs un-flavored tobacco user)
Coded Excerpt Effect:
Support for menthol cigarette and flavored cigar ban
Excerpt polarity:
-
Citation:

Yang, Y., Lindblom, E. N., Ward, K. D., & Salloum, R. G. (2022). How Smokers of Menthol Cigarettes and Flavored Cigars Might Respond to FDA’s Proposed Bans. Nicotine and Tobacco Research, 24(10), 1645–1653.

98
760
Menthol use → (O) Support for flavor ban, PCS = -4

All groups were predominantly ​​supportive of a smoking ban in restaurants, with ​​highest support reported by menthol smokers ​​(73.5%), and lowest by other flavoured cigarette ​​smokers (63.3%). Almost half of all smokers ​​supported the ban on smoking in bars and pubs, ​​with the support varying significantly by the type ​​of cigarette smoked (56.1% among menthol, 45.4% ​​among other flavoured cigarette smokers).

Coded Excerpt Cause:
Menthol Smoker (vs other flavor smoker)
Coded Excerpt Effect:
Support for ban on smoking in restaurants
Excerpt polarity:
+
Citation:

Zatoński, M., Herbeć, A., Zatoński, W., Przewoźniak, K., Janik-Koncewicz, K., Mons, U., Fong, G., Demjén, T., Tountas, Y., Trofor, A., Fernández, E., McNeill, A., Willemsen, M., Hummel, K., Quah, A., Kyriakos, C., & Vardavas, C. (2018). Characterising smokers of menthol and flavoured cigarettes,their attitudes towards tobacco regulation, and the anticipatedimpact of the Tobacco Products Directive on their smoking andquitting behaviours: The EUREST-PLUS ITC Europe Surveys. Tobacco Induced Diseases, 16(2).

98
761
Menthol use → (O) Support for flavor ban, PCS = -4

The most divisive issue between menthol smokers ​​and other smokers was that of banning additives, ​​including flavourings, in cigarettes, with only 25.1% ​​of menthol smokers supporting such a law, compared ​​to 49.9% of other flavoured cigarette smokers.

Coded Excerpt Cause:
Menthol Smoker (vs other flavor smoker)
Coded Excerpt Effect:
Support for banning additives in cigarettes
Excerpt polarity:
-
Citation:

Zatoński, M., Herbeć, A., Zatoński, W., Przewoźniak, K., Janik-Koncewicz, K., Mons, U., Fong, G., Demjén, T., Tountas, Y., Trofor, A., Fernández, E., McNeill, A., Willemsen, M., Hummel, K., Quah, A., Kyriakos, C., & Vardavas, C. (2018). Characterising smokers of menthol and flavoured cigarettes,their attitudes towards tobacco regulation, and the anticipatedimpact of the Tobacco Products Directive on their smoking andquitting behaviours: The EUREST-PLUS ITC Europe Surveys. Tobacco Induced Diseases, 16(2).

117
940
Support for flavor ban → (S) Retailer Compliance, PCS = 1

During the ​​follow-up period, 85.5% of retailers reported that educational ​​visits and 62.2% reported that the MAHB flavoured product ​​guidance list were the most helpful for achieving compliance.

Coded Excerpt Cause:
Educational visits by Tobacco Compliance Officers
Coded Excerpt Effect:
Retailer Compliance to a Flavored Tobacco Products Ban
Excerpt polarity:
+
Citation:

Kephart, L., Setodji, C., Pane, J., Shadel, W., Song, G., Robertson, J., Harding, N., Henley, P., & Ursprung, W. W. S. (2019). Evaluating tobacco retailer experience and compliance with a flavoured tobacco product restriction in Boston, Massachusetts: impact on product availability, advertisement and consumer demand. Tobacco Control, tobaccocontrol-2019-055124.

133
1070
Policy enforcement → (S) Retailer Compliance, PCS = 1

Between the first and last rounds of compliance checks, ​violations for sale of tobacco to a minor decreased by 12 percent​age points to 2%

Coded Excerpt Cause:
Flavored tobacco sales restrictions (except menthol/in tobacco bars) (Intensified enforcement)
Coded Excerpt Effect:
Retailer Compliance to a Flavored Tobacco Products Ban
Excerpt polarity:
+
Citation:

Pearlman, D. N., Arnold, J. A., Guardino, G. A., & Welsh, E. B. (2019). Advancing Tobacco Control Through Point of Sale Policies, Providence, Rhode Island. Preventing Chronic Disease, 16, 180614.

No results found.

Oops! It seems we couldn't find any results for your search. Please try different filters.